Our Privacy Statment & Cookie Policy
All LSEG websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
The Financial & Risk business of Thomson Reuters is now Refinitiv
All names and marks owned by Thomson Reuters, including "Thomson", "Reuters" and the Kinesis logo are used under license from Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.
Performance incentive fee funds fare worse in quarters that include the economic downturn
The line graph charts the excess return experienced by performance incentive fee funds since December 1999 for quarterly rolling one-year periods. The number of months when performance incentive fee funds outperform funds without performance incentive fees is evenly split. In 23 of the 50 quarters, funds with performance incentive fees outperform their classification average. The most deeply negative time for performance incentive fee funds was 2008 and 2009, which would include fund performance during the height of the downturn. Since then, during the recovery, funds with performance incentives have performed similarly to funds without performance incentives with excess returns bouncing around the zero mark since June 2010. During the last two quarters of 2010 and the first two quarters of 2011 performance incentive fee funds’ performance was better on average than funds without incentive fees; however, they performed worse in the next three quarters. In the final quarter in this chart, performance incentive fee funds performed just slightly worse (0.21%).
Total Net Assets (TNA) of Funds in Asian Markets by Domicile In the third quarter of ...
Highlights Total fund flows for October were €58.34bn, down on both September ...
In this issue of LSEG Lipper’s Global Mutual Funds & Exchange-Traded Products ...
In this issue of LSEG Lipper’s US Mutual Funds & Exchange-Traded Products ...