The Financial & Risk business of Thomson Reuters is now Refinitiv

All names and marks owned by Thomson Reuters, including "Thomson", "Reuters" and the Kinesis logo are used under license from Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.

January 29, 2016

Lipper U.S. Weekly Fund Flows: A Tale of Two Cities

by Tom Roseen.

During the fund-flows week ended January 27, 2016, markets continued their wild swings upon hearing conflicting market and economic news throughout the week. On Thursday, January 21, U.S. stocks got a shot in the arm, fueled by a rally in oil prices, despite news that crude inventories had risen the prior week, that weekly initial jobless claims had risen to their highest level since July, and that the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank’s manufacturing index remained in negative territory for the fifth month in a row. Hints of more stimuli by the European Central Bank and news that China’s central bank had injected more cash into the country’s financial system helped markets gain some footing. On Friday all three major U.S. indices posted their first week of plus-side returns for 2016 after oil prices rose to their highest levels in nearly two weeks and after a report showed that North American oil rigs’ output had declined slightly. Market participants cheered news that preliminary readings of the purchasing managers’ index were on the rise and that December existing-home sales rose a whopping 14.7%.

Unfortunately, another major rout in oil prices weighed heavily on the markets on the following Monday, sending the Dow Jones Industrial Average down by triple digits as investors began to look for clues on the Fed’s outlook after the FOMC meeting adjourned on Wednesday. Nonetheless, U.S. markets rose once again after witnessing another rebound in oil prices and after learning about strong earnings reports from bellwether firms Sprint, P&G, and 3M. The U.S. market shrugged off another round of large declines in China’s Shanghai Composite and cheered news that November U.S. home prices rose at their fastest pace in 16 months and that January’s consumer confidence index beat expectations. Despite the Fed leaving rates unchanged after its January FOMC meeting, some investors worried that it had left the door open for a March interest rate increase, even though it acknowledged that economic growth had slowed. That led the U.S. markets to suffer yet another round of declines on Wednesday. A rise in oil and news that new home sales had rebounded in December weren’t enough to push the markets higher.

While investors were net purchasers of fund assets (including those of conventional funds and exchange-traded funds [ETFs]), injecting a net $16.6 billion for the fund-flows week ended January 27, the headline numbers were a little misleading. As might be expected, given the recent volatility, investors turned their backs on equity funds, redeeming $1.2 billion net for the week, but they padded the coffers of money market funds (+$13.9 billion), taxable bond funds (+$3.3 billion), and municipal bond funds (+$0.6 billion).

For the first week in four equity ETFs witnessed net inflows, taking in $3.9 billion. Despite concerns over the FOMC announcement, authorized participants (APs) were net purchasers of domestic equity ETFs (+$3.8 billion), injecting money into that group also for the first week in four. They also padded—for the first week in three—the coffers of nondomestic equity ETFs (but only to the tune of +$107 million). Perhaps as a result of the strengthening oil prices and better-than-expected earnings news from stalwart U.S. firms, APs turned their attention to some big-name ETFs, with SPDR S&P 500 ETF (+$3.5 billion), iShares Russell 2000 ETF (+$2.7 billion), and iShares MSCI Japan (+$0.7 billion) attracting the largest amounts of net new money of all individual equity ETFs. At the other end of the spectrum iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (-$0.7 billion) experienced the largest net redemptions, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (-$0.5 billion) suffered the second largest redemptions for the week. For the seventh week in a row APs padded the coffers of government/Treasury funds, injecting $3.7 billion for the week, their largest net inflows since February 4, 2015.

Once again, in contrast to equity ETF investors, for the fourth week in a row conventional fund (ex-ETF) investors were net redeemers of equity funds, redeeming $5.1 billion from the group. Domestic equity funds, handing back $4.9 billion, witnessed their twelfth consecutive week of net outflows, despite posting a weekly return of 1.35%. Meanwhile, their nondomestic equity fund counterparts witnessed $0.2 billion of net outflows—suffering net redemptions for the first week in three. On the domestic side investors lightened up on large-cap funds and equity income funds, redeeming a net $2.3 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, for the week. On the nondomestic side global equity funds witnessed $1.2 billion of net outflows, while international equity funds attracted some $1.0 billion.

For the twelfth consecutive week taxable bond funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net outflows, handing back a little over $2.6 billion for the week. Corporate investment-grade debt funds suffered the largest redemptions for the week, witnessing net outflows of $2.1 billion (for their tenth consecutive week of net redemptions), while corporate high-yield funds witnessed the second largest net redemptions (-$0.7 million). Despite the Fed’s leaving the door open for a March rate hike, bank rate funds—handing back some $0.7 billion for the week—experienced their twenty-seventh consecutive week of net outflows. In a flight to safety investors injected net new money into government mortgage funds (+$0.6 billion), government/Treasury and mortgage funds (+$0.4 billion), and government/Treasury funds (+$0.1 billion) for the week. For the seventeenth week in a row municipal bond funds (ex-ETFs) witnessed net inflows, taking in $502 million this past week.

For more information on this week’s Lipper fund flows data, please visit here.

Article Topics

Get In Touch


We have updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.×