by Detlef Glow.
Asked about the key factors for future growth of the ETF industry, Caroline Baron (Head of ETF Business Development, EMEA at Franklin Templeton) said that beside other factors, client education would be one of the key drivers for future growth. Her fellow panelists, Kate Dwyer (Head of Passives UK at Invesco) and Sam Manchanda (Head of Passive Client Coverage Division, North EMEA at DWS), agreed with this view. Kate Dwyer amended that client education is nowadays more important since we are moving away from plain vanilla products to more complex products.
I strongly agree with this view, especially where it concerns the more complex products, but unfortunately none of the panelists explained what these education efforts should look like and/or what they plan in detail around investor education. This lack of clarity on how the panelists think how investor education should look and how they want to achieve/contribute to these goals gave me the feeling that the claim for more and better investor education is rather a wish than a goal. This is a pity, since I am pretty sure that the education of all kinds of investors will be one of the key drivers for the future growth of the overall ETF industry in Europe.
The panelists also agreed that they need to return to in-person client meetings to foster future growth. Even as some of the comments sounded like some of the panelists think that in-person meetings—like in the pre-COVID-19 world—are their key focus for future growth, one needs to say that all panelists agreed that hybrid sales models with a mix of remote and in-person customer meetings are the distribution approach for the future.
Are in-person meetings really the future for the distribution for ETFs in Europe? What I have heard from fund selectors and gatekeepers so far is quite the opposite, since they plan to limit in-person meetings in the post COVID-19 environment because they learned that online meetings work in many cases—especially for product pitches—as good as in-person meetings. That said, I do agree that in-person meetings are necessary for introduction purposes, but other than that there are only a few occasions in which in-person meetings do offer an advantage compared to online meetings.
From my point of view, the promoters of ETFs need to review their distribution and service models since the ways investors buy funds and ETFs have changed during the pandemic. ETF promoters need to adopt this new reality to their business models and distribution strategies in order to be successful in the future. This may also mean that they need to reallocate their resources and may use some of their travel budget to fund their own investor education programs.
As for the future of ETF distribution, it was unfortunate that the panelists did not speak about new distribution opportunities such as the tokenization of ETFs—this might be a way to increase the usage of ETFs by institutional investors. This was shown by the example of the collateral trade JP Morgan settled by using its Onyx Digital Assets blockchain earlier this month.
The views expressed are the views of the author, not necessarily those of Refinitiv Lipper or LSEG.
Refinitiv Lipper delivers data on more than 330,000 collective investments in 113 countries. Find out more.
Join a growing community of asset managers and stay up to date with the latest research from Refinitiv and partners to help you inform your investment decisions. Follow our Asset Management LinkedIn showcase page.