Our Privacy Statment & Cookie Policy

All LSEG websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

July 24, 2023

Monday Morning Memo: Review of the ESMA Report on the UCITS Sanctions 2022

by Detlef Glow.

On July 18, 2023, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published its seventh annual report concerning penalties and measures issued under the UCITS Directive. The report shows that nine National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in Europe have issued a total of 38 measures which amount to penalties of more than 97.4 million EUR against market participants in 2022.

A closer view on the single penalties shows that 96.5 million EUR of these penalties were issued by the French regulator Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) against H2O, which leaves the overall amount of penalties issued for all other instances at 0.972 million EUR.

The report also shows that 16 NCAs did not impose any sanction (penalty or measure) during the reference period.

Within the report, ESMA states that the AMF issued the majority of financial penalties over the reporting period (2016 – 2022)

Graph 1: Global Overview of Penalties Issued by NCAs under the UCITS Directive, January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2022

Review of the ESMA report on NCA sanctions 2023

Source: ESMA

Generally, ESMA concludes that data gathered under the sanction reports published so far keeps showing that the sanction powers are not equally used among the different NCAs and that the limited number of NCAs which have issued sanctions and the number and amount of sanctions are relatively low.

From my point of view, this raises the question of whether all NCAs are seriously analyzing the processes and practices in their local funds industries. In an answer to this question, ESMA acknowledges that the issue at hand can be complex and multi-faceted, and that no automatic parallelism should be drawn between the number or amount of sanctions (penalties and measures) issued by an NCA and the quality of their supervisory activity. At the same time, ESMA assumes that one reason for the low number of penalties and measures might be that NCAs instead use escalated supervisory measures instead of taking enforcement measures. Regarding this, ESMA reiterates the importance of using the full range of the supervisory and enforcement toolkit provided to NCAs under the UCITS Directive.

Another point of concern from my point of view are the generally low amounts of penalties issued in comparison to the overall assets under management and the resulting management fees within the European fund industry. Taking into account that the overall sum of penalties was driven by three major penalties, the average amount of penalties per year was around 1.1 million EUR when subtracting the three major penalties from the overall.

 

This article is for information purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice.

The views expressed are the views of the author, not necessarily those of Refinitiv Lipper or LSEG.

We have updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.x