Our Privacy Statment & Cookie Policy

All LSEG websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

June 10, 2019

The Month in Closed-End Funds: May 2019

by Tom Roseen.

REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

For the month, 43% of all CEFs posted NAV-based returns in the black, with only 14% of equity CEFs and 65% of fixed income CEFs chalking up returns in the plus column. For the first month in three, Lipper’s mixed-asset CEFs macro-group (-2.39%) mitigated losses better than or outpaced its two equity-based brethren: domestic equity CEFs (-3.30%) and world equity CEFs (-4.88%). For the first month in seven, the Real Estate CEFs classification (+0.11%, the only plus-side return in the CEF equity universe) outperformed all other equity classifications, followed by Utility CEFs (-1.85%) and Income & Preferred Stock CEFs (-1.92%).

For the second month in three, municipal bond CEFs jumped to the top of the leaderboard, posting a plus-side return on average (+1.86%), followed by domestic taxable bond CEFs (-0.28%) and world income CEFs (-0.30%). Four of the domestic taxable fixed income CEF classifications posted plus-side returns for the month, with Corporate BBB-Rated Debt CEFs, U.S. Mortgage CEFs (+0.89%), and Corporate BBB-Rated Debt CEFs  (Leveraged) (+0.79%) posting the strongest returns of the group. For the seventh consecutive month, the municipal debt CEFs macro-group posted a return in the black on average, with all the classifications in the group experiencing plus-side returns for May.

For May, the median discount of all CEFs widened 54 bps to 8.12%—still narrower than the 12-month moving average median discount (8.64%). In this report, we highlight May 2019 CEF performance trends, premiums and discounts, and corporate actions and events.

Highlights:

  • For the first month in five, equity closed-end funds (CEFs) on average suffered negative returns, declining 3.44% on a net-asset-value (NAV) basis for May, while for the fifth month in a row, fixed income CEFs chalked up returns on the plus-side (+0.67%).
  • Only 17% of all CEFs traded at a premium to their NAV, with 19% of equity CEFs and 15% of fixed income CEFs trading in premium territory. The single state municipal debt CEFs macro-classification witnessed the largest narrowing of discounts for the month among Lipper’s CEF macro-groups—64 basis points (bps) to 9.82%.
  • Real Estate CEFs (+0.10%) posted the only positive returns of all equity CEF classifications for the month.
  • The California Municipal Debt CEFs classification (+2.00%) posted the strongest plus-side returns in the fixed income universe for the month.
  • For the seventh month in a row, the municipal debt CEFs macro-group posted a plus-side return on average (+1.86%), with all classifications in the group witnessing positive returns for May.

Download our Closed-End Funds FundMarket Insight Report: The Month in Closed-End Funds: May 2019 here.

Lipper delivers data on more than 265,000 collective investments in 61 countries. Find out more

Get In Touch

Subscribe

Related Reports

The data in the article below is sourced from Lipper’s Global Fund Flows application. ...

Fixed income funds realized a return of positive 0.50% on average during the first ...

In this issue of LSEG Lipper’s Global Mutual Funds & Exchange-Traded Products ...

In this issue of LSEG Lipper’s Swiss Mutual Funds & Exchange-Traded Products ...

We have updated our Privacy Statement. Before you continue, please read our new Privacy Statement and familiarize yourself with the terms.x