Our Privacy Statment & Cookie Policy
All LSEG websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
The Financial & Risk business of Thomson Reuters is now Refinitiv
All names and marks owned by Thomson Reuters, including "Thomson", "Reuters" and the Kinesis logo are used under license from Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.
The decision by the Trump administration to put tariffs on imports from China has sent share prices tumbling across the world, as fears over a trade war have risen. A global trade war would have serious, negative consequences for the global economy, but this remains an outside risk in our opinion. It remains to be seen how China will react to the US President’s move, but there are several reasons that we do not anticipate a sharp decline in global trade in response to the announced tariffs.
Refresh the chart in your browser | Edit chart in Datastream
First, China’s response has been limited so far. When it was announced that the US would impose tariffs on Chinese imports on Thursday, China responded by suggesting that it would consider putting tariffs on US imports worth up to US$3 billion per year. That is small relative to the value of Chinese goods that will be subject to US import tariffs (up to the value of US$60 billion per year). These values represent around 2% of US goods exports to China and 11% of US goods imports from China, respectively. At the time of writing, the Chinese government had not indicated any further retaliatory measures over and above the tariffs aforementioned.
Refresh the chart in your browser | Edit chart in Datastream
Want more charts and analysis? Access a pre-built library of charts built by Fathom Consulting via Datastream Chartbook in Thomson Reuters Eikon.
Second, China has more to lose from a trade war than the US does, making it less likely to escalate tensions than is perhaps generally perceived; exports to the US account for a far larger share of China’s GDP than US exports to China do, as a share of US GDP.
Refresh the chart in your browser | Edit chart in Datastream
Third, the US President may well soften his stance like he did following the announcement of tariffs on US steel imports two weeks ago. Indeed, in a note we sent to clients on 13th March, we highlighted the fact that the US President had already exempted Canada and Mexico from the tariffs and that further exemptions were possible. Today, it seems that other US allies and large steel exporters to the US, such as the EU, Korea, Japan and Brazil, will be excused from these tariffs too.
Admittedly, the President may have less incentive to soften his stance on China like he did with US security allies over steel. And by getting his allies to the negotiating table and exempting them from steel tariffs, he may well be able to garner their support in the fight to tackle China’s contribution to global trade imbalances and its alleged violation of the WTO rules. If the US does get the support of its trade allies, it makes China less likely to respond aggressively to the US trade tariffs. It could even force China to open up its markets to US firms, and firms from other countries, which would boost global trade.
Refresh the chart in your browser | Edit chart in Datastream
Refresh the chart in your browser | Edit chart in Datastream
Finally, Donald Trump may have a protectionist inclination on trade, but he is also pro-business and uses the S&P 500 as a barometer of success. A trade war, threatening a large decline in the stock market and US jobs, is not in his interest, or that of his support base. With all this in mind, we do not expect recent trade tensions to escalate significantly.
______________________________________________________________________
Financial time series database which allows you to identify and examine trends, generate and test ideas and develop view points on the market.
Thomson Reuters offers the world’s most comprehensive historical database for numerical macroeconomic and cross-asset financial data which started in the 1950s and has grown into an indispensable resource for financial professionals. Find out more.
For the month of May, investors injected some $167.5 billion into the mutual fund ...
The Lipper Loan Participation Funds classification—including both conventional mutual ...
Funds in Refinitiv Lipper’s municipal debt peer groups (including both mutual funds and ...
Funds in Refinitiv Lipper’s Inflation-Protected Bond (TIPS) classification (including ...